The international standards for accrediting laboratory’s technical competence has evolved over the past 30 over years, started from ISO Guide 25: 1982 to ISO Guide 25:1990, to ISO, to ISO and now to the final draft international standard FDIS, which is due to be published before the end of this year to replace the 2005 version. We do not anticipate much changes to the contents other than any editorial amendments. The new draft standard aims to align its structure and contents with other recently revised ISO standards, and the ISO 9001:2015 in particular. Borderlands 2 Modded Weapons Codes After Patch. It is reinforcing a process-based model and focuses on outcomes rather than prescriptive requirements such as eliminating familiar terms like quality manual, quality manager, etc. Kellogg`s Mission Nutrition Game: Full Version Software. And giving less description on other documentation. Radical Face Ghost 2007 Rapidshare.

It attempts to introduce more flexibility for laboratory operation. Although many requirements remain unchanged but appear in different places of the document, it has added some new concepts such as: – focusing on risk-based thinking and acting, – decision rule for measurement uncertainty to be accountable for when stating conformity with a specification, – sampling as another laboratory activity apart from testing, and calibration, and, – sampling uncertainty to be a significant contributing factor for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty. The purpose of introducing sampling as another activity is understandable, as we know that the reliability of test results is hanged on how representative the sample drawn from the field is. The saying “ The test result is no better than the sample that it is based upon” is very true indeed.